Jordan vs Tajikistan, Republic of: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Jordan
- Tajikistan, Republic of
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Tajikistan, Republic of, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Tajikistan, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 88th and Tajikistan, Republic of ranks 88th of 190 countries.
Tajikistan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Tajikistan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology | Tajikistan, Republic of |
| 2010s | 0.05 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.45 DB15-20 methodology | Tajikistan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Jordan or Tajikistan, Republic of?
- Jordan, at 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Tajikistan, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Jordan and Tajikistan, Republic of?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tajikistan, Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Tajikistan, Republic of rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Jordan ranks 88th and Tajikistan, Republic of ranks 88th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.