Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Uzbekistan: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
0.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Uzbekistan
0.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
88th
Uzbekistan rank
88th

Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Uzbekistan
00.10.20.30.40.5200320112019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 88th and Uzbekistan ranks 88th of 190 countries.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 0.4286 DB15-20 methodology 0.0714 DB15-20 methodology Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2010s 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 0.5 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Uzbekistan?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Uzbekistan?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Uzbekistan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Uzbekistan rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 88th and Uzbekistan ranks 88th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Uzbekistan: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/reorganization-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/uzbekistan/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Uzbekistan: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.