Ecuador vs India: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Ecuador
- India
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 DB15-20 methodology against 0 DB15-20 methodology in India, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 133rd and India ranks 133rd of 188 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0.2 DB15-20 methodology | 0.2 DB15-20 methodology | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Ecuador or India?
- Ecuador, at 0 DB15-20 methodology against 0 DB15-20 methodology in India as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Ecuador and India?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and India?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and India rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Ecuador ranks 133rd and India ranks 133rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.