Cameroon vs Madagascar: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Cameroon
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Madagascar, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 86th and Madagascar ranks 86th of 188 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.6429 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1429 DB15-20 methodology | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Cameroon or Madagascar?
- Cameroon, at 0.5 DB15-20 methodology against 0.5 DB15-20 methodology in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Cameroon and Madagascar?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Madagascar?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Madagascar rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Cameroon ranks 86th and Madagascar ranks 86th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.