Cabo Verde vs Gambia: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Gambia
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Gambia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 57th and Gambia ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.3 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7 DB15-20 methodology | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Cabo Verde or Gambia?
- Cabo Verde, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in Gambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Cabo Verde and Gambia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Gambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cabo Verde and Gambia rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Cabo Verde ranks 57th and Gambia ranks 57th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.