Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Brazil: Reorganization proceedings index (0-3)
Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
- Brazil
How they compare
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Brazil, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st and Brazil ranks 31st of 190 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 1.14 DB15-20 methodology | 1.14 DB15-20 methodology | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.4 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 1.6 DB15-20 methodology | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher reorganization proceedings index (0-3), Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Brazil?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in reorganization proceedings index (0-3) between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Brazil?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Brazil?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Brazil rank globally for reorganization proceedings index (0-3)?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st and Brazil ranks 31st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.