Romania vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Romania
0.2659 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
0.144 current US$
in 2020
Romania rank
112th
Sudan rank
113th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Romania
- Sudan
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.2659 current US$ against 0.144 current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 0.1219 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.8 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Romania ranks 112th and Sudan ranks 113th of 150 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.325 current US$ | 0.0714 current US$ | 0.2535 current US$ | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.2659 current US$ | 0.144 current US$ | 0.1219 current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Romania or Sudan?
- Romania, at 0.2659 current US$ against 0.144 current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Romania and Sudan?
- 0.1219 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Romania and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Romania ranks 112th and Sudan ranks 113th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.