Pakistan vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Pakistan
10.04 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
9.99 current US$
in 2020
Pakistan rank
84th
South Africa rank
85th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Pakistan
- South Africa
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 10.04 current US$ against 9.99 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 0.05 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.
Pakistan ranks 84th and South Africa ranks 85th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 79.43 current US$ | 79.43 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2000s | 3.75 current US$ | 59.1 current US$ | 55.35 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2010s | 10.33 current US$ | 7.25 current US$ | 3.08 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 10.04 current US$ | 9.99 current US$ | 0.051 current US$ | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Pakistan or South Africa?
- Pakistan, at 10.04 current US$ against 9.99 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Pakistan and South Africa?
- 0.05 current US$, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Pakistan and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Pakistan ranks 84th and South Africa ranks 85th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.