New Zealand vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
New Zealand
288.53 current US$
in 2020
Peru
331.48 current US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
9th
Peru rank
8th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- New Zealand
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 331.48 current US$ against 288.53 current US$ in New Zealand, a difference of 42.95 current US$.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
New Zealand ranks 9th and Peru ranks 8th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 297.67 current US$ | 3,537 current US$ | 3,239 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 628.01 current US$ | 2,330 current US$ | 1,702 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 442.6 current US$ | 142.37 current US$ | 300.22 current US$ | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 288.53 current US$ | 331.48 current US$ | 42.95 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, New Zealand or Peru?
- Peru, at 331.48 current US$ against 288.53 current US$ in New Zealand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between New Zealand and Peru?
- 42.95 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do New Zealand and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- New Zealand ranks 9th and Peru ranks 8th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.