Namibia vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Namibia
189.4 current US$
in 2020
Peru
331.48 current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
11th
Peru rank
8th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Namibia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 331.48 current US$ against 189.4 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 142.08 current US$.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.8 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
Namibia ranks 11th and Peru ranks 8th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,643 current US$ | 3,537 current US$ | 1,894 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 1,164 current US$ | 2,330 current US$ | 1,165 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 172.47 current US$ | 142.37 current US$ | 30.1 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 189.4 current US$ | 331.48 current US$ | 142.08 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Namibia or Peru?
- Peru, at 331.48 current US$ against 189.4 current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Namibia and Peru?
- 142.08 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Namibia and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Namibia ranks 11th and Peru ranks 8th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.