Malta vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Malta
450.04 current US$
in 2020
Peru
331.48 current US$
in 2020
Malta rank
6th
Peru rank
8th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Malta
- Peru
How they compare
Malta currently reports 450.04 current US$ against 331.48 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 118.56 current US$.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
Malta ranks 6th and Peru ranks 8th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 153.64 current US$ | 3,537 current US$ | 3,383 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 961.35 current US$ | 2,330 current US$ | 1,368 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 144.56 current US$ | 142.37 current US$ | 2.18 current US$ | Malta |
| 2020s | 450.04 current US$ | 331.48 current US$ | 118.55 current US$ | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Malta or Peru?
- Malta, at 450.04 current US$ against 331.48 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Malta and Peru?
- 118.56 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Malta and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Malta ranks 6th and Peru ranks 8th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.