Latvia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Latvia
102.45 current US$
in 2020
Panama
105.57 current US$
in 2020
Latvia rank
28th
Panama rank
27th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Latvia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 105.57 current US$ against 102.45 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 3.12 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.
Latvia ranks 28th and Panama ranks 27th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71.5 current US$ | 201.68 current US$ | 130.17 current US$ | Panama |
| 2000s | 765.8 current US$ | 470.04 current US$ | 295.76 current US$ | Latvia |
| 2010s | 501.52 current US$ | 168.66 current US$ | 332.86 current US$ | Latvia |
| 2020s | 102.45 current US$ | 105.57 current US$ | 3.12 current US$ | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Latvia or Panama?
- Panama, at 105.57 current US$ against 102.45 current US$ in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Latvia and Panama?
- 3.12 current US$, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Latvia ranks 28th and Panama ranks 27th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.