Iceland vs Norway: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Iceland
8,445 current US$
in 2020
Norway
1,522 current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
1st
Norway rank
2nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Iceland
- Norway
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 8,445 current US$ against 1,522 current US$ in Norway, a difference of 6,923 current US$.
That makes Iceland's figure about 5.5 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 150 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,520 current US$ | 535.59 current US$ | 8,984 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2000s | 11,892 current US$ | 1,277 current US$ | 10,615 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2010s | 10,763 current US$ | 1,822 current US$ | 8,940 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2020s | 8,445 current US$ | 1,522 current US$ | 6,923 current US$ | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Iceland or Norway?
- Iceland, at 8,445 current US$ against 1,522 current US$ in Norway as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Iceland and Norway?
- 6,923 current US$, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Norway?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Norway rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Iceland ranks 1st and Norway ranks 2nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.