Guyana vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Guyana
181.18 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
189.4 current US$
in 2020
Guyana rank
12th
Namibia rank
11th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Guyana
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 189.4 current US$ against 181.18 current US$ in Guyana, a difference of 8.22 current US$.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Guyana ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 11th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,422 current US$ | 1,643 current US$ | 221.06 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1,082 current US$ | 1,164 current US$ | 82.43 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 210.22 current US$ | 172.47 current US$ | 37.74 current US$ | Guyana |
| 2020s | 181.18 current US$ | 189.4 current US$ | 8.22 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Guyana or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 189.4 current US$ against 181.18 current US$ in Guyana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Guyana and Namibia?
- 8.22 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Guyana and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Guyana ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 11th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.