Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Guinea-Bissau
64.63 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
58.99 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
40th
Mauritius rank
42nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Mauritius
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 64.63 current US$ against 58.99 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 5.64 current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 40th and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 103.18 current US$ 169.52 current US$ 66.34 current US$ Mauritius
2000s 147.18 current US$ 102.09 current US$ 45.09 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 69.63 current US$ 26.9 current US$ 42.73 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 64.63 current US$ 58.99 current US$ 5.63 current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Guinea-Bissau or Mauritius?
Guinea-Bissau, at 64.63 current US$ against 58.99 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
5.64 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 40th and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-current-us/guinea-bissau/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-current-us/guinea-bissau/mauritius/">Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
150 places, 3,859 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed