Guatemala vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Guatemala
2.2 current US$
in 2020
Montenegro
2.92 current US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
100th
Montenegro rank
97th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Guatemala
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 2.92 current US$ against 2.2 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 0.72 current US$.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 100th and Montenegro ranks 97th of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0472 current US$ | 0.0226 current US$ | 0.0246 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 4.11 current US$ | 2.28 current US$ | 1.82 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 2.2 current US$ | 2.92 current US$ | 0.7189 current US$ | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Guatemala or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 2.92 current US$ against 2.2 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Guatemala and Montenegro?
- 0.72 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Guatemala and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Guatemala ranks 100th and Montenegro ranks 97th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.