Ghana vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Ghana
71.81 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
79.41 current US$
in 2020
Ghana rank
36th
Sweden rank
33rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Ghana
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 79.41 current US$ against 71.81 current US$ in Ghana, a difference of 7.6 current US$.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sweden ahead.
Ghana ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 71.37 current US$ | 71.37 current US$ | Sweden |
| 2000s | 12.48 current US$ | 78.43 current US$ | 65.96 current US$ | Sweden |
| 2010s | 42.91 current US$ | 33.62 current US$ | 9.29 current US$ | Ghana |
| 2020s | 71.81 current US$ | 79.41 current US$ | 7.6 current US$ | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Ghana or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 79.41 current US$ against 71.81 current US$ in Ghana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Ghana and Sweden?
- 7.6 current US$, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ghana and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Ghana ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.