Georgia vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Georgia
198.99 current US$
in 2020
Peru
331.48 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
10th
Peru rank
8th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Georgia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 331.48 current US$ against 198.99 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 132.49 current US$.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.7 times Georgia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 10th and Peru ranks 8th of 150 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.89 current US$ | 3,537 current US$ | 3,527 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 16.48 current US$ | 2,330 current US$ | 2,313 current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 45.49 current US$ | 142.37 current US$ | 96.88 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 198.99 current US$ | 331.48 current US$ | 132.49 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Georgia or Peru?
- Peru, at 331.48 current US$ against 198.99 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Georgia and Peru?
- 132.49 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Georgia ranks 10th and Peru ranks 8th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.