Georgia vs Oman: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Georgia
198.99 current US$
in 2020
Oman
414.63 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
10th
Oman rank
7th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Georgia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 414.63 current US$ against 198.99 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 215.64 current US$.
That makes Oman's figure about 2.1 times Georgia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 10th and Oman ranks 7th of 150 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.89 current US$ | 91.18 current US$ | 81.29 current US$ | Oman |
| 2000s | 16.48 current US$ | 260.33 current US$ | 243.85 current US$ | Oman |
| 2010s | 45.49 current US$ | 233.09 current US$ | 187.6 current US$ | Oman |
| 2020s | 198.99 current US$ | 414.63 current US$ | 215.64 current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Georgia or Oman?
- Oman, at 414.63 current US$ against 198.99 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Georgia and Oman?
- 215.64 current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Oman?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Oman rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Georgia ranks 10th and Oman ranks 7th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.