Georgia vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Georgia
198.99 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
189.4 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
10th
Namibia rank
11th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Georgia
- Namibia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 198.99 current US$ against 189.4 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 9.59 current US$.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Georgia ranks 10th and Namibia ranks 11th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.89 current US$ | 1,643 current US$ | 1,633 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 16.48 current US$ | 1,164 current US$ | 1,148 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 45.49 current US$ | 172.47 current US$ | 126.98 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 198.99 current US$ | 189.4 current US$ | 9.59 current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Georgia or Namibia?
- Georgia, at 198.99 current US$ against 189.4 current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Georgia and Namibia?
- 9.59 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Georgia ranks 10th and Namibia ranks 11th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.