France vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
France
51.22 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
58.99 current US$
in 2020
France rank
44th
Mauritius rank
42nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- France
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 58.99 current US$ against 51.22 current US$ in France, a difference of 7.77 current US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times France's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
France ranks 44th and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, France averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.08 current US$ | 169.52 current US$ | 119.44 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 125.84 current US$ | 102.09 current US$ | 23.75 current US$ | France |
| 2010s | 27.19 current US$ | 26.9 current US$ | 0.2841 current US$ | France |
| 2020s | 51.22 current US$ | 58.99 current US$ | 7.77 current US$ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, France or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 58.99 current US$ against 51.22 current US$ in France as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between France and Mauritius?
- 7.77 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do France and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- France ranks 44th and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.