Estonia vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Estonia
88.5 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
79.41 current US$
in 2020
Estonia rank
30th
Sweden rank
33rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Estonia
- Sweden
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 88.5 current US$ against 79.41 current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 9.09 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sweden ahead.
Estonia ranks 30th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 153.39 current US$ | 71.37 current US$ | 82.02 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 197.57 current US$ | 78.43 current US$ | 119.14 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2010s | 129.06 current US$ | 33.62 current US$ | 95.44 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2020s | 88.5 current US$ | 79.41 current US$ | 9.09 current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Estonia or Sweden?
- Estonia, at 88.5 current US$ against 79.41 current US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Estonia and Sweden?
- 9.09 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Estonia and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Estonia ranks 30th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.