Estonia vs Panama: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Estonia
88.5 current US$
in 2020
Panama
105.57 current US$
in 2020
Estonia rank
30th
Panama rank
27th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Estonia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 105.57 current US$ against 88.5 current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 17.07 current US$.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.
Estonia ranks 30th and Panama ranks 27th of 150 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 153.39 current US$ | 201.68 current US$ | 48.29 current US$ | Panama |
| 2000s | 197.57 current US$ | 470.04 current US$ | 272.47 current US$ | Panama |
| 2010s | 129.06 current US$ | 168.66 current US$ | 39.6 current US$ | Panama |
| 2020s | 88.5 current US$ | 105.57 current US$ | 17.08 current US$ | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Estonia or Panama?
- Panama, at 105.57 current US$ against 88.5 current US$ in Estonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Estonia and Panama?
- 17.07 current US$, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Panama?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Estonia and Panama rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Estonia ranks 30th and Panama ranks 27th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.