Estonia vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Estonia
88.5 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia
87.29 current US$
in 2020
Estonia rank
30th
Malaysia rank
31st
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Estonia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 88.5 current US$ against 87.29 current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 1.21 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malaysia ahead.
Estonia ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 153.39 current US$ | 1,586 current US$ | 1,432 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 197.57 current US$ | 751.01 current US$ | 553.44 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 129.06 current US$ | 90.86 current US$ | 38.2 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2020s | 88.5 current US$ | 87.29 current US$ | 1.21 current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Estonia or Malaysia?
- Estonia, at 88.5 current US$ against 87.29 current US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Estonia and Malaysia?
- 1.21 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Estonia and Malaysia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Estonia ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 31st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.