Croatia vs Ecuador: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Croatia
27.46 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador
31.3 current US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
60th
Ecuador rank
58th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Croatia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 31.3 current US$ against 27.46 current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 3.84 current US$.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.
Croatia ranks 60th and Ecuador ranks 58th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.9 current US$ | 94.31 current US$ | 82.41 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 62.18 current US$ | 276.22 current US$ | 214.04 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 46.7 current US$ | 38.36 current US$ | 8.34 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2020s | 27.46 current US$ | 31.3 current US$ | 3.85 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Croatia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 31.3 current US$ against 27.46 current US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Croatia and Ecuador?
- 3.84 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Ecuador?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Ecuador rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Croatia ranks 60th and Ecuador ranks 58th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.