Congo vs Italy: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Congo
44.15 current US$
in 2020
Italy
37.41 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
50th
Italy rank
53rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Congo
- Italy
How they compare
Congo currently reports 44.15 current US$ against 37.41 current US$ in Italy, a difference of 6.74 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Italy ahead.
Congo ranks 50th and Italy ranks 53rd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 77.49 current US$ | 77.49 current US$ | Italy |
| 2000s | 20.89 current US$ | 118.55 current US$ | 97.66 current US$ | Italy |
| 2010s | 34.18 current US$ | 21.31 current US$ | 12.88 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 44.15 current US$ | 37.41 current US$ | 6.74 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Congo or Italy?
- Congo, at 44.15 current US$ against 37.41 current US$ in Italy as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Congo and Italy?
- 6.74 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Italy?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Italy rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Congo ranks 50th and Italy ranks 53rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.