Congo vs Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Congo
44.15 current US$
in 2020
Guinea
41.11 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
50th
Guinea rank
51st
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Congo
- Guinea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 44.15 current US$ against 41.11 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 3.04 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea ahead.
Congo ranks 50th and Guinea ranks 51st of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 5.47 current US$ | 5.47 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 20.89 current US$ | 10.44 current US$ | 10.45 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 34.18 current US$ | 28.33 current US$ | 5.86 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 44.15 current US$ | 41.11 current US$ | 3.03 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Congo or Guinea?
- Congo, at 44.15 current US$ against 41.11 current US$ in Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Congo and Guinea?
- 3.04 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Congo ranks 50th and Guinea ranks 51st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.