China vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
China
16.37 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
18.69 current US$
in 2020
China rank
77th
Sri Lanka rank
76th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- China
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 18.69 current US$ against 16.37 current US$ in China, a difference of 2.32 current US$.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
China ranks 77th and Sri Lanka ranks 76th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 154.05 current US$ | 50.19 current US$ | 103.86 current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 92.6 current US$ | 42.87 current US$ | 49.73 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 17.73 current US$ | 15.94 current US$ | 1.79 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 16.37 current US$ | 18.69 current US$ | 2.33 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, China or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 18.69 current US$ against 16.37 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between China and Sri Lanka?
- 2.32 current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- China ranks 77th and Sri Lanka ranks 76th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.