Chile vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Chile
173.76 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
189.4 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
13th
Namibia rank
11th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Chile
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 189.4 current US$ against 173.76 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 15.64 current US$.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Chile ranks 13th and Namibia ranks 11th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 348.84 current US$ | 1,643 current US$ | 1,294 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 690.71 current US$ | 1,164 current US$ | 473.62 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 325.53 current US$ | 172.47 current US$ | 153.05 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 173.76 current US$ | 189.4 current US$ | 15.64 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Chile or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 189.4 current US$ against 173.76 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Chile and Namibia?
- 15.64 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Chile ranks 13th and Namibia ranks 11th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.