Chile vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Chile
173.76 current US$
in 2020
Georgia
198.99 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
13th
Georgia rank
10th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 198.99 current US$ against 173.76 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 25.23 current US$.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 13th and Georgia ranks 10th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 348.84 current US$ | 9.89 current US$ | 338.94 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 690.71 current US$ | 16.48 current US$ | 674.23 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 325.53 current US$ | 45.49 current US$ | 280.03 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 173.76 current US$ | 198.99 current US$ | 25.24 current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Chile or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 198.99 current US$ against 173.76 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Chile and Georgia?
- 25.23 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Chile ranks 13th and Georgia ranks 10th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.