Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0102 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
0.144 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
115th
Sudan rank
113th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.144 current US$ against 0.0102 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1338 current US$.
That makes Sudan's figure about 14.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 115th and Sudan ranks 113th of 150 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0109 current US$ | 0.0714 current US$ | 0.0606 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0102 current US$ | 0.144 current US$ | 0.1338 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.144 current US$ against 0.0102 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan?
- 0.1338 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 115th and Sudan ranks 113th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.