Belize vs Malta: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Belize
1,249 current US$
in 2020
Malta
450.04 current US$
in 2020
Belize rank
3rd
Malta rank
6th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Belize
- Malta
How they compare
Belize currently reports 1,249 current US$ against 450.04 current US$ in Malta, a difference of 798.96 current US$.
That makes Belize's figure about 2.8 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 6th of 150 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,545 current US$ | 153.64 current US$ | 11,391 current US$ | Belize |
| 2000s | 6,119 current US$ | 961.35 current US$ | 5,158 current US$ | Belize |
| 2010s | 553.5 current US$ | 144.56 current US$ | 408.95 current US$ | Belize |
| 2020s | 1,249 current US$ | 450.04 current US$ | 799.37 current US$ | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Belize or Malta?
- Belize, at 1,249 current US$ against 450.04 current US$ in Malta as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Belize and Malta?
- 798.96 current US$, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belize and Malta rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Belize ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 6th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.