Belgium vs Gambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Belgium
22.44 current US$
in 2020
Gambia
21.86 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
69th
Gambia rank
72nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Belgium
- Gambia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 22.44 current US$ against 21.86 current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 0.58 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Gambia ahead.
Belgium ranks 69th and Gambia ranks 72nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Gambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.97 current US$ | 45.75 current US$ | 27.78 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 19.7 current US$ | 47.18 current US$ | 27.49 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2010s | 19.87 current US$ | 33.6 current US$ | 13.73 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2020s | 22.44 current US$ | 21.86 current US$ | 0.5826 current US$ | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Belgium or Gambia?
- Belgium, at 22.44 current US$ against 21.86 current US$ in Gambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Belgium and Gambia?
- 0.58 current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Gambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Gambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Belgium ranks 69th and Gambia ranks 72nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.