Belgium vs El Salvador: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Belgium
22.44 current US$
in 2020
El Salvador
23.27 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
69th
El Salvador rank
66th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Belgium
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 23.27 current US$ against 22.44 current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 0.83 current US$.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 69th and El Salvador ranks 66th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.97 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 17.97 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 19.7 current US$ | 24.03 current US$ | 4.33 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 19.87 current US$ | 16.48 current US$ | 3.39 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2020s | 22.44 current US$ | 23.27 current US$ | 0.8277 current US$ | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Belgium or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 23.27 current US$ against 22.44 current US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Belgium and El Salvador?
- 0.83 current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and El Salvador?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and El Salvador rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Belgium ranks 69th and El Salvador ranks 66th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.