Belgium vs Cameroon: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Belgium
22.44 current US$
in 2020
Cameroon
22.44 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
69th
Cameroon rank
70th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Belgium
- Cameroon
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 22.44 current US$ against 22.44 current US$ in Cameroon, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 69th and Cameroon ranks 70th of 150 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.97 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 17.97 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 19.7 current US$ | 13.33 current US$ | 6.37 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 19.87 current US$ | 18.12 current US$ | 1.75 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2020s | 22.44 current US$ | 22.44 current US$ | 0.0053 current US$ | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Belgium or Cameroon?
- Belgium, at 22.44 current US$ against 22.44 current US$ in Cameroon as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Belgium and Cameroon?
- 0 current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cameroon?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Cameroon rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Belgium ranks 69th and Cameroon ranks 70th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.