Australia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Australia
49.16 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
45.06 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
46th
Tunisia rank
48th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Australia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 49.16 current US$ against 45.06 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 4.1 current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 46th and Tunisia ranks 48th of 150 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74.41 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 74.41 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 131.93 current US$ | 22.13 current US$ | 109.81 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 79.61 current US$ | 33.99 current US$ | 45.62 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 49.16 current US$ | 45.06 current US$ | 4.09 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Australia or Tunisia?
- Australia, at 49.16 current US$ against 45.06 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Australia and Tunisia?
- 4.1 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Australia ranks 46th and Tunisia ranks 48th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.