Australia vs France: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Australia
49.16 current US$
in 2020
France
51.22 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
46th
France rank
44th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Australia
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 51.22 current US$ against 49.16 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 2.06 current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 46th and France ranks 44th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and France in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74.41 current US$ | 50.08 current US$ | 24.32 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 131.93 current US$ | 125.84 current US$ | 6.1 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 79.61 current US$ | 27.19 current US$ | 52.42 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 49.16 current US$ | 51.22 current US$ | 2.07 current US$ | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Australia or France?
- France, at 51.22 current US$ against 49.16 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Australia and France?
- 2.06 current US$, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and France?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and France rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Australia ranks 46th and France ranks 44th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.