Australia vs Cambodia: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Australia
49.16 current US$
in 2020
Cambodia
47.33 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
46th
Cambodia rank
47th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Australia
- Cambodia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 49.16 current US$ against 47.33 current US$ in Cambodia, a difference of 1.83 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 46th and Cambodia ranks 47th of 150 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74.41 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 74.41 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 131.93 current US$ | 16.78 current US$ | 115.15 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 79.61 current US$ | 29.84 current US$ | 49.78 current US$ | Australia |
| 2020s | 49.16 current US$ | 47.33 current US$ | 1.83 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Australia or Cambodia?
- Australia, at 49.16 current US$ against 47.33 current US$ in Cambodia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Australia and Cambodia?
- 1.83 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cambodia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Cambodia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Australia ranks 46th and Cambodia ranks 47th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.