Argentina vs Ghana: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Argentina
64.63 current US$
in 2020
Ghana
71.81 current US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
39th
Ghana rank
36th
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Argentina
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 71.81 current US$ against 64.63 current US$ in Argentina, a difference of 7.18 current US$.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 39th and Ghana ranks 36th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 403.56 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 403.56 current US$ | Argentina |
| 2000s | 116.33 current US$ | 12.48 current US$ | 103.86 current US$ | Argentina |
| 2010s | 31.07 current US$ | 42.91 current US$ | 11.84 current US$ | Ghana |
| 2020s | 64.63 current US$ | 71.81 current US$ | 7.18 current US$ | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Argentina or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 71.81 current US$ against 64.63 current US$ in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Argentina and Ghana?
- 7.18 current US$, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Ghana?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Ghana rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Argentina ranks 39th and Ghana ranks 36th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.