Angola vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries
Angola
62.98 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
58.99 current US$
in 2020
Angola rank
41st
Mauritius rank
42nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time
- Angola
- Mauritius
How they compare
Angola currently reports 62.98 current US$ against 58.99 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 3.99 current US$.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
Angola ranks 41st and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 169.52 current US$ | 169.52 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 17.43 current US$ | 102.09 current US$ | 84.66 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 51.35 current US$ | 26.9 current US$ | 24.45 current US$ | Angola |
| 2020s | 62.98 current US$ | 58.99 current US$ | 3.99 current US$ | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Angola or Mauritius?
- Angola, at 62.98 current US$ against 58.99 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Angola and Mauritius?
- 3.99 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Angola and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
- Angola ranks 41st and Mauritius ranks 42nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.