Togo vs Tuvalu: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Togo
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Togo, a difference of 0.0059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Togo ranks 128th and Tuvalu ranks 127th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | -0.8273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | -0.441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Togo or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Togo and Tuvalu?
- 0.0059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Tuvalu?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Togo and Tuvalu rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Togo ranks 128th and Tuvalu ranks 127th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.