Malawi vs Uzbekistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Malawi
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports -0.5267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi, a difference of 0.0583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 143rd and Uzbekistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malawi |
| 2000s | -0.5624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malawi |
| 2010s | -0.6598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malawi |
| 2020s | -0.6779 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0347 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Malawi or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at -0.5267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Uzbekistan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Malawi ranks 143rd and Uzbekistan ranks 140th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.