Kiribati vs Uganda: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Kiribati
- Uganda
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uganda, a difference of 0.0229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uganda ahead.
Kiribati ranks 135th and Uganda ranks 137th of 204 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uganda |
| 2010s | -0.857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4644 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uganda |
| 2020s | -0.5469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.495 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kiribati or Uganda?
- Kiribati, at -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kiribati and Uganda?
- 0.0229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Uganda rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 135th and Uganda ranks 137th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.