Kiribati vs Lesotho: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Kiribati
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports -0.4849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 135th and Lesotho ranks 133rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | -0.857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4888 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lesotho |
| 2020s | -0.5469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kiribati or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at -0.4849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kiribati and Lesotho?
- 0.0165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Lesotho?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Lesotho rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 135th and Lesotho ranks 133rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.