Kenya vs Tuvalu: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Kenya
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Kenya currently reports -0.3336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Kenya ranks 124th and Tuvalu ranks 127th of 204 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.3629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kenya |
| 2010s | -0.3578 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kenya |
| 2020s | -0.4016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1825 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kenya or Tuvalu?
- Kenya, at -0.3336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kenya and Tuvalu?
- 0.0686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Tuvalu?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Tuvalu rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kenya ranks 124th and Tuvalu ranks 127th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.