Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Eswatini
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Eswatini ranks 149th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.4872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | -0.4151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | -0.5859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Eswatini or Marshall Islands?
- Eswatini, at -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Marshall Islands rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Eswatini ranks 149th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.