Egypt vs Kiribati: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Egypt
- Kiribati
How they compare
Egypt currently reports -0.4995 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Egypt ranks 134th and Kiribati ranks 135th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.2963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Egypt |
| 2010s | -0.5956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2614 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Egypt |
| 2020s | -0.5894 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0425 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Egypt or Kiribati?
- Egypt, at -0.4995 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Egypt and Kiribati?
- 0.0019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kiribati?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Kiribati rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Egypt ranks 134th and Kiribati ranks 135th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.