Ecuador vs Marshall Islands: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Ecuador
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -0.6464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.0412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Ecuador ranks 150th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Marshall Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | -0.9308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | -0.6031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Ecuador or Marshall Islands?
- Ecuador, at -0.6464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Ecuador and Marshall Islands?
- 0.0412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Marshall Islands rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 150th and Marshall Islands ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.