Congo vs Zimbabwe: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Congo ranks 182nd and Zimbabwe ranks 183rd of 205 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.97 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Congo |
| 2010s | -1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Congo |
| 2020s | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Congo ranks 182nd and Zimbabwe ranks 183rd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.