China vs Mongolia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- China
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports -0.0707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in China, a difference of 0.0006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was China ahead.
China ranks 99th and Mongolia ranks 98th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | China |
| 2000s | -0.2863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | -0.1458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | China |
| 2020s | -0.0671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, China or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at -0.0707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between China and Mongolia?
- 0.0006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mongolia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do China and Mongolia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- China ranks 99th and Mongolia ranks 98th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.